Build Steelman Arguments for Both Sides of Tough Decisions with Fabric analyze_debate
Overcome confirmation bias on major career, financial or technical decisions. Use Fabric's `analyze_debate` pattern to construct the strongest possible "Steelman" case for each side.
Humans naturally strawman the option they dislike. Steelmanning forces you to confront the strongest version of both paths before committing.
Step-by-Step Action Checklist
0 / 4 CompletedApply the `danielmiessler/fabric` **analyze_debate** pattern and **Steelmanning** principle to this dilemma: [Describe decision context and options A vs B] Output: 1) **Steelman for Option A** (the strongest, most charitable 3 arguments); 2) **Steelman for Option B** (the strongest, most charitable 3 arguments); 3) **Hidden Blind Spots** each side tends to ignore; 4) **The Core Crux**: Which 2 fundamental beliefs or risk-tolerance variables actually determine the right choice?