Critique Academic Papers Like a Peer Reviewer with Fabric analyze_paper
Don't get fooled by cherry-picked SOTA tables. Use Fabric's `analyze_paper` pattern to audit experimental design, baseline fairness, statistical power and overclaimed conclusions.
Novices read papers to summarize; experts read to falsify. Running a Reviewer #2 audit before submission catches fatal baseline and ablation gaps early.
Step-by-Step Action Checklist
0 / 4 CompletedUsing the `danielmiessler/fabric` **analyze_paper** pattern, act as a rigorous Peer Reviewer (#2) and audit the academic paper below: [Paste Abstract, Methodology and Experiments] Output: 1) **True Core Contribution** (stripped of buzzwords); 2) **Methodological & Experimental Flaws** (weak baselines, sample bias, hyperparameter unfairness, data leakage); 3) **Missing Ablation Studies & Failure Modes**; 4) **Overclaimed Conclusions vs. Actual Empirical Proof**; 5) **3 Tough Questions for the Authors**.